TM v MZ - May 18, 2018 - DN 155398

The Michigan Supreme Court resolved in the split in COA PPO panels and held that the expiration of a PPO does not cause the appeal of a PPO to become moot (and therefore it is not necessary to find an exception to the mootness doctrine) as the respondent would still be entitled to have LEIN reflect that the PPO was vacated or was otherwise improperly entered.

One other interesting aspect of this opinion is that it appears to address the application of MCR 3.705(C) & 18 USC 2265(d)(3) and the Supreme Court ordered the parties to be referred to by their initials and captioned the opinion as TM v MZ (at the Court of Appeals the parties were still referred to by their names).

Continue Reading Read Less

Contact Us Today

Get A Consultation

Get started today by calling us at (616) 227-4470 or contact us online today.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • In which county will your case take place?
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from MI Family Law Center at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy